eISSN: 2300-6722
ISSN: 1899-1874
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
2/2022
vol. 38
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Left atrial appendage thrombus in patients referred to electrical cardioversion for typical atrial flutter

Łukasz Turek
1
,
Marcin Sadowski
1
,
Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska
1
,
Jacek Kurzawski
1
,
Andrzej Jaroszyński
1

  1. Institute of Medical Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland Head of the Institute: Beata Kręcisz MD, PhD, Prof. JKU
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne 2022; 38 (2): 132–139
Online publish date: 2022/06/30
Article file
- Left atrial.pdf  [0.14 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Typical atrial flutter (AFL) is a macro-reentry circuit involving the cavotricuspid isthmus. In a surface 12-lead electrocardiogram an inverted saw-tooth F-wave pattern with a rate of 250–330 beats per minute, no isoelectric line between deflections, and usually slower ventricular response are observed [1, 2]. The exact AFL epidemiology remains unknown. The overall incidence of AFL is estimated at 88/100,000 person-years in the US population annually [3]. AFL is associated with increased risk of heart failure (HF), stroke, systemic thromboembolism, and mortality [1, 4–8]. Stroke risk stratification in patients with AFL remains a complicated issue [1, 9–12]. Left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) is regarded as a risk factor for stroke in these patients; however, the actual LAAT-related health risk in patients with AFL on chronic anticoagulation remains unknown [13]. Moreover, the risk factors and prevalence of LAAT in patients with AFL on oral anticoagulation (OAC) (i.e. non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)) have not been fully established [13]. It seems that the actual LAAT-related health risk varies according to thrombus age, medical management, and procedures (i.e. cardioversion, conservative management) or left atrial appendage morphology [13]. Although the restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with AFL increases the stroke risk [11, 14–17], the stroke mechanism can be difficult to establish [13]. The proper anticoagulation reduces stroke risk following the sinus rhythm restoration [1, 13].

Aim of the research

The aim of this research was to evaluate the predictors and prevalence of LAAT and to assess the predictive role of LAAT in relation to mortality and the risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolic events among consecutive patients with typical AFL on oral anticoagulation referred to cardioversion.

Material and methods

Study group

Consecutive patients with typical AFL on OAC were admitted to the cardiology department for transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided direct current cardioversion (DCC). Of the 69 enrolled patients between April 2011 and March 2018, 26 (37.7%) underwent DCC. The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, arrhythmia duration > 48 h, symptomatic or poorly tolerated arrhythmia, and OAC for > 3 weeks. The exclusion criteria were as follows: systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg, bradycardia < 60/min, signs of exacerbation of HF, symptoms of peripheral hypoperfusion, history of electrical cardioversion, history of ablation, any prosthetic heart valve, moderate to severe mitral stenosis defined as mitral orifice area ≤ 1.5 cm2 with mean pressure gradient ≥ 5 mm Hg, and history of intracardiac thrombus. All patients were followed up for 12 months from the day of the TEE. The evaluation of clinical events included systemic thromboembolic events, stroke, and death.

Anticoagulation therapy

All enrolled patients were on OAC therapy according to the current guidelines: VKA therapy with international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 2.0, or uninterrupted NOAC for at least 3 weeks before study inclusion [18–21]. For patients on a VKA regimen, INR was tested every week for 3 weeks, with all the outcomes expected to be within the therapeutic range. For patients on dabigatran, treatment with 150 mg twice daily was required, but 110 mg twice daily was also allowed for those fulfilling the following criteria: age ≥ 80 years and/or concomitant use of verapamil and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate 30–49 ml/min/1.73 m2 and/or a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 [19]. In the case of rivaroxaban, treatment with 20 mg once daily was required; however, 15 mg once daily was also allowed in patients fulfilling the following criteria: estimated glomerular filtration rate 15–49 ml/min/1.73 m2 and/or HAS-BLED score ≥ 3. In the case of apixaban, treatment with 5 mg twice daily was required, but 2.5 mg twice daily was also allowed in patients fulfilling at least 2 of the following criteria: age ≥ 80 years, body weight ≤ 60 kg, and serum creatinine level ≥ 1.5 mg/dl.

Echocardiographic examination

All examinations were performed by three independent certified echocardiographers using a Vivid E9 (GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Horten, Norway) ultrasound machine with a multiplanar transducer according to the approved protocol [22]. On TEE, the left atrial appendage was visualized in the mid-oesophageal view with an appropriate total gain and depth. The imaging plane of the TEE transducer was axially rotated from 0° to 180° to better visualize the contours of the endocardium. The thrombus was defined as a uniformly echo-dense intracavitary mass with defined margins distinct from the endocardium and seen throughout systole and diastole, observed in more than one imaging plane, and not related to the pectinate muscles [23, 24]. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated by the Simpson’s biplane method using manual tracing on 2D apical 4- and 2-chamber views [25]. The anteroposterior diameter of the left atrium (LA) was assessed in end-systole in a plane perpendicular to the long axis of the ascending aorta in the parasternal long-axis view. All transthoracic echocardiogram and TEE examinations were recorded and stored and were available for re-evaluation if needed.

Ethics

The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee (reg. no. 21/2010). All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the local Bioethics Committee and the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data were presented as arithmetic mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile ranges, when appropriate. Numbers and percentages were used to describe qualitative data. Group comparisons were conducted using Fisher’s exact test or the c2 test for qualitative variables. Due to a violation of the assumption of normality (normality of the distribution was checked with the Shapiro-Wilk test), the distributions of quantitative variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test (for 2 groups) or the Kruskal-Wallis test (for more than 2 groups). For the comparison of distributions of more than 2 groups, post-hoc tests were conducted to define differences in pairs when the global null hypothesis about identical compared distributions was rejected. Crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine the predictors of LAAT on TEE.
A multivariable logistic regression model was built using the variables from the age- (< 75 or ≥ 75 years) and sex-adjusted univariable analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess whether quantitative variables had a statistically significant ability to distinguish between the group with LAAT and the group without LAAT. ROC analysis included calculation of the area under the curve. Quantitative predictors of LAAT on TEE received from the ROC analysis were transformed into qualitative variables with 2 categories and treated as dichotomous prior to further analyses using a previously defined cut-off point (optimal decision threshold). The optimal cut-off point was determined as the point maximizing Youden’s index. For all tests, a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant (two-tailed). All statistical analyses were performed using the R software package version 3.6.2 (R: language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; https://www.R-project.org/).

Results

The baseline characteristics according to the anticoagulant agent administered are described in Table 1. LAA thrombi were detected in 7 (10.1%) patients. There was no difference in the prevalence of LAAT between different types of OAC (p = 0.1). Patients with LAAT more frequently had previous stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic thromboembolism (Table 2). In the dabigatran group, the dose was reduced in 7 (22.6%) patients without LAAT and in 2 (33.3%) patients with LAAT (p = 0.62). In the rivaroxaban group, the dose was reduced in 4 (20%) patients without LAAT and in 0 (0.0%) patients with LAAT. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the composite endpoint (prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack/thromboembolic event) was a significant predictor of thrombus formation in patients with AFL (OR = 14.75; 95% CI: 2.17–108.33, p = 0.005) (Table 3). ROC analysis demonstrated that the anteroposterior left atrial diameter was able to predict LAAT presence (Table 4). The optimal cut-off value based on the Youden index for this variable was ≥ 45 mm. However, that finding was not confirmed in the uni- and multivariable analyses (Table 5).

Effectiveness of electrical cardioversion

DCC was performed in 26 patients (without complications), and sinus rhythm was restored in 26 subjects. In 36 patients directly after TEE a catheter ablation without DCC was performed (without complications), and sinus rhythm was restored in 36 subjects.

Follow-up

Follow-up was completed for all participants. No deaths, strokes, or systemic thromboembolic events occurred during the 12 months following TEE. In the group who had undergone DCC, 8 had a subsequent catheter ablation for AFL during the follow-up period.

Discussion

Despite the uninterrupted OAC therapy according to the guidelines [18, 19, 21, 26, 27] in patients with typical AFL of > 48-hour duration referred for DCC, we were able to reveal an unexpectedly high (> 10%) LAAT prevalence irrespective of the anticoagulant agent type. A composite endpoint (prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack/thromboembolic event) was able to predict the LAAT presence. In accordance with European Society of Cardiology and American Heart Association recommendations [1, 28], the significant role of the AFL therapeutic management is stroke and thromboembolic events protection. However, there are no prospective randomized studies on the incidence of thromboembolic complications and the efficacy of anticoagulation in patients with AFL. The anticoagulant recommendations for AFL cardioversion are mainly based on the evidence from clinical trials on AF. The rules of DCC preparation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) on VKAs have been developed following small, non-randomized trials [29, 30]. Dabigatran was added after a post-hoc analysis of the randomized RE-LY study [31]. Rivaroxaban was introduced after a post-hoc analysis of the randomized ROCKET-AF study and the outcomes of the X-VeRT study, which compared its effectiveness with that of VKAs [32, 33]. Apixaban was approved after a post-hoc analysis of the randomized ARISTOTLE study and the outcomes of the EMANATE study, which compared its effectiveness with VKAs [34, 35].
Despite the high rate of the presence of LAAT in the current study, we did not note long-term clinical consequences of LAAT in relation to strokes, systemic thromboembolic events, and deaths in our study population during the 12-month follow-up. We speculate that the presence of LAAT in AFL patients on chronic OAC might not serve as a real indicator of the inadequacy of oral anticoagulant therapy.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the prevalence of LAAT, its predictive factors, and the possible risk of stroke, thromboembolic events, and death associated with this pathology in patients referred for DCC on chronic anticoagulation. Our study has several limitations. First, the sample size was small. Even though all consecutive patients were included, the referral for DCC is rare in this group due to the increasing ablation rates. In addition, the sample size was limited by the detection of LAAT. Second, we did not examine patients on edoxaban. Third, we used the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula to estimate the glomerular filtration rate, which was designed for individuals with a body surface area of 1.73 m2, and we did not calculate the body surface area; therefore, misdosing of dabigatran and rivaroxaban may have occurred. Fourth, we did not examine the total duration of OAC intake prior to study inclusion. Fifth, we did not examine the total duration of arrhythmia prior to study inclusion. Sixth, we did not calculate the LA area and volume. Seventh, we did not examine the association between the morphology of the left atrial appendage and the emptying velocities of the left atrial appendage and LAAT. Finally, a 12-month follow-up period might be too short to reveal thromboembolic complications.

Conclusions

In patients on OAC an unexpectedly high prevalence of LAAT was observed. History of stroke/transient ischaemic attack/thromboembolic event could be used to predict the LAAT presence. No deaths, strokes, or systemic thromboembolic events occurred during the follow-up period.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Brugada J, Katritsis DG, Arbelo E, Arribas F, Bax JJ, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Calkins H, Corrado D, Deftereos SG, Diller GP, Gomez-Doblas JJ, Gorenek B, Grace A, Ho SY, Kaski JC, Kuck KH, Lambiase PD, Sacher F, Sarquella-Brugada G, Suwalski P, Zaza A, Group ESCSD. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardiaThe Task Force for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2020; 41: 655-720.
2. Katritsis DG, Boriani G, Cosio FG, Hindricks G, Jais P, Josephson ME, Keegan R, Kim YH, Knight BP, Kuck KH, Lane DA, Lip GY, Malmborg H, Oral H, Pappone C, Themistoclakis S, Wood KA, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Gorenek B, Dagres N, Dan GA, Vos MA, Kudaiberdieva G, Crijns H, Roberts-Thomson K, Lin YJ, Vanegas D, Caorsi WR, Cronin E, Rickard J. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE). Europace 2017; 19: 465-511.
3. Granada J, Uribe W, Chyou PH, Maassen K, Vierkant R, Smith PN, Hayes J, Eaker E, Vidaillet H. Incidence and predictors of atrial flutter in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 2242-2246.
4. Biblo LA, Yuan Z, Quan KJ, Mackall JA, Rimm AA. Risk of stroke in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 346-349, A9.
5. Gula LJ, Redfearn DP, Jenkyn KB, Allen B, Skanes AC, Leong-Sit P, Shariff SZ. Elevated incidence of atrial fibrillation and stroke in patients with atrial flutter – a population-based study. Can J Cardiol 2018; 34: 774-783.
6. Halligan SC, Gersh BJ, Brown RD Jr, Rosales AG, Mun- ger TM, Shen WK, Hammill SC, Friedman PA. The natural history of lone atrial flutter. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 265-268.
7. Rahman F, Wang N, Yin X, Ellinor PT, Lubitz SA, LeLorier PA, McManus DD, Sullivan LM, Seshadri S, Vasan RS, Benjamin EJ, Magnani JW. Atrial flutter: clinical risk factors and adverse outcomes in the Framingham Heart Study. Heart Rhythm 2016; 13: 233-240.
8. Vadmann H, Nielsen PB, Hjortshoj SP, Riahi S, Rasmus- sen LH, Lip GY, Larsen TB. Atrial flutter and thromboembolic risk: a systematic review. Heart 2015; 101: 1446-1455.
9. Cresti A, Garcia-Fernandez MA, De Sensi F, Miracapil- lo G, Picchi A, Scalese M, Severi S. Prevalence of auricular thrombosis before atrial flutter cardioversion: a 17-year transoesophageal echocardiographic study. Europace 2016; 18: 450-456.
10. Huang JJ, Reddy S, Truong TH, Suryanarayana P, Al- pert JS. Atrial appendage thrombosis risk is lower for atrial flutter compared with atrial fibrillation. Am J Med 2018; 131: 442e13-442e17.
11. Kobayashi N, Kasahara M, Kasahara H, Ushimaru H, Ochi T, Saito M, Yaginuma T. Impaired atrial contraction in patients with atrial flutter and gradual recovery after cardioversion. Jpn Circ J 1998; 62: 15-20.
12. Sychev OS, Borodai AA, Borodai ES. Detection of signs of thrombus formation in patients with typical atrial flutter. Kardiologiia 2015; 55: 56-60.
13. Janion-Sadowska A, Turek Ł, Dudek A, Andrychowski J, Sadowski M. Atrial fibrillation and flutter – the state of the art. Part 2. Medical Studies 2021; 37: 239-249.
14. Ghali WA, Wasil BI, Brant R, Exner DV, Cornuz J. Atrial flutter and the risk of thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 2005; 118: 101-107.
15. Irani WN, Grayburn PA, Afridi I. Prevalence of thrombus, spontaneous echo contrast, and atrial stunning in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial flutter. A prospective study using transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 1997; 95: 962-966.
16. Lanzarotti CJ, Olshansky B. Thromboembolism in chronic atrial flutter: is the risk underestimated? J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 1506-1511.
17. Sakurai K, Hirai T, Nakagawa K, Kameyama T, Noza- wa T, Asanoi H, Inoue H. Prolonged activation of hemostatic markers following conversion of atrial flutter to sinus rhythm. Circ J 2004; 68: 1041-1044.
18. European Heart Rhythm A, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic S, Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, Van Gelder IC, Al-Attar N, Hindricks G, Prendergast B, Heidbuchel H, Alfieri O, Angeli- ni A, Atar D, Colonna P, De Caterina R, De Sutter J, Goet- te A, Gorenek B, Heldal M, Hohloser SH, Kolh P, Le Heuzey JY, Ponikowski P, Rutten FH. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2369-2429.
19. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, Hindricks G, Kirchhof P, Guidelines ESCCfP. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2719-2747.
20. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, Antz M, Hacke W, Oldgren J, Sinnaeve P, Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, European Heart Rhythm A. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2013; 15: 625-651.
21. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, Antz M, Die- ner HC, Hacke W, Oldgren J, Sinnaeve P, Camm AJ, Kirch- hof P. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2015; 17: 1467-1507.
22. Kasprzak JD, Hoffman P, Płońska E, Szyszka A, Braksa- tor W, Gackowski A, Plewka M, Drożdż J, Gąsior Z, Pruszczyk P. In Poland Echokardiografia w praktyce klinicznej – Standardy Sekcji Echokardiografii Polskiego Towarzystwa Kardiologicznego 2007. Kardiol Pol 2007; 65: 1142-1162.
23. Anselmino M, Garberoglio L, Gili S, Bertaglia E, Stabile G, Marazzi R, Themistoclakis S, Solimene F, Frea S, Grosso Marra W, Morello M, Scaglione M, De Ponti R, Gaita F. Left atrial appendage thrombi relate to easily accessible clinical parameters in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation transcatheter ablation: a multicenter study. Int J Cardiol 2017; 241: 218-222.
24. Seidl K, Rameken M, Drogemuller A, Vater M, Brandt A, Schwacke H, Bergmeier C, Zahn R, Senges J. Embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and effective anticoagulation: value of transesophageal echocardiography to guide direct-current cardioversion. Final results of the Ludwigshafen Observational Cardioversion Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1436-1442.
25. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Fo- ster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise J, Solomon S, Spencer KT, St John Sutton M, Stewart W, American Society of Echocardiography’s N, Standards C, Task Force on Chamber Q, American College of Cardiology Echocardiography C, American Heart A, European Association of Echocardiography ESoC. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006; 7: 79-108.
26. Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL, Le Heuzey J-Y, Kay GN, Lowe JE, Olsson SB, Prystowsky EN, Tamargo JL, Wann S, Smith SC, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Priori SG, Blanc J-J, Budaj A, Camm AJ, Dean V, Deckers JW, Despres C, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo JL, Zamorano JL. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation – Executive Summary. Circulation 2006; 114: 700-752.
27. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P, Agewall S, Camm J, Baron Esquivias G, Budts W, Carerj S, Casselman F, Coca A, De Caterina R, Deftereos S, Dobrev D, Ferro JM, Filippa- tos G, Fitzsimons D, Gorenek B, Guenoun M, Hohnlo- ser SH, Kolh P, Lip GY, Manolis A, McMurray J, Ponikow- ski P, Rosenhek R, Ruschitzka F, Savelieva I, Sharma S, Suwalski P, Tamargo JL, Taylor CJ, Van Gelder IC, Voors AA, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Zeppenfeld K. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50: e1-e88.
28. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, Jr., Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW, Members AATF. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2014; 130: e199-e267.
29. Bjerkelund CJ, Orning OM. The efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in preventing embolism related to D.C. electrical conversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1969; 23: 208-216.
30. Arnold AZ, Mick MJ, Mazurek RP, Loop FD, Trohman RG. Role of prophylactic anticoagulation for direct current cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 851-855.
31. Nagarakanti R, Ezekowitz MD, Oldgren J, Yang S, Chernick M, Aikens TH, Flaker G, Brugada J, Kamensky G, Parekh A, Reilly PA, Yusuf S, Connolly SJ. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of patients undergoing cardioversion. Circulation 2011; 123: 131-136.
32. Piccini JP, Stevens SR, Lokhnygina Y, Patel MR, Halpe- rin JL, Singer DE, Hankey GJ, Hacke W, Becker RC, Nes- sel CC, Mahaffey KW, Fox KA, Califf RM, Breithardt G, Committee RAS, Investigators. Outcomes after cardioversion and atrial fibrillation ablation in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin in the ROCKET AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 1998-2006.
33. Cappato R, Ezekowitz MD, Klein AL, Camm AJ, Ma CS, Le Heuzey JY, Talajic M, Scanavacca M, Vardas PE, Kirchhof P, Hemmrich M, Lanius V, Meng IL, Wildgoose P, van Eickels M, Hohnloser SH, Investigators XV. Rivaroxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 3346-3355.
34. Flaker G, Lopes RD, Al-Khatib SM, Hermosillo AG, Hohnloser SH, Tinga B, Zhu J, Mohan P, Garcia D, Bartunek J, Vinereanu D, Husted S, Harjola VP, Rosenqvist M, Alexander JH, Granger CB, Committees A, Investigators. Efficacy and safety of apixaban in patients after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARISTOTLE Trial (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 1082-1087.
35. Ezekowitz MD, Pollack CV, Jr., Halperin JL, England RD, VanPelt Nguyen S, Spahr J, Sudworth M, Cater NB, Breazna A, Oldgren J, Kirchhof P. Apixaban compared to heparin/vitamin K antagonist in patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for cardioversion: the EMANATE trial. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 2959-2971.
Copyright: © 2022 Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.