eISSN: 2354-0265
ISSN: 2353-6942
Health Problems of Civilization Physical activity: diseases and issues recognized by the WHO
Current issue Archive Online first About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
3/2024
vol. 18
 
Share:
Share:
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY OF SOCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL GROUPS
Original paper

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPINAL COLUMN HEALTH AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AMONG SCHOOLCHILDREN AGED 12-13

Mónika Szigethy
1, 2
,
Katalin Nagyváradi
1
,
Judit H. Ekler
1
,
Ferenc Ihász
1

  1. Institute of Sports Science, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University Szombathely, Hungary
  2. Doctoral School of Education, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Health Prob Civil. 2024; 18(3): 310-319.
Online publish date: 2024/01/29
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

“Posture” is a motor habit formed at a specific morphological and functional level [1].. From this point of view, posture is an indicator of the mechanical efficiency of the kinetic sense, which requires muscle balance and neuromuscular coordination. Others define posture as the optimal body position in which we achieve the best possible biomechanical efficiency with the least possible energy expenditure during our daily activities. In this case, the tension of the joint capsules and ligaments corresponds to the physiological level and the loading of the articular surfaces is uniform [2,3]. Nowadays, correct posture is increasingly rare among children, thanks to prolonged incorrect sitting, ergonomically inappropriate desks, poorly carried school bags and lack of physical activity [4-6]. As a result, muscle balance is upset and posture disorders occur [5,7]. Adolescence is a critical period for the development of posture disorders. In this case, the hormonal balance of children changes, the rate of growth accelerates [6], and as a result of the different rate of development of bones and muscles, dysfunctional posture may occur [1].

Posture represents physical and mental health [8,9]. Optimum posture depends on many factors, but one of the most important of these is physical activity of the right intensity and reducing a sedentary lifestyle [10-12]. Risk factors for the development of increased back kyphosis include incorrect posture habits of adolescents, such as incorrect sitting position or prolonged use of electronic devices [9,13]. In most cases, spinal disorders and vertebral disorders that develop in adulthood are caused by poor posture, primarily the consequences of poor posture in childhood, and can be prevented with adequate exercises [14,15]. The World Health Organization [16] recommends that children and adolescents should do at least 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity per day. Based on research conducted among school-age children in Hungary, the proportion of non-athletes in boys between the ages of 9 and 15 rose continuously from 15.3% to 31.0%, and in girls of the same age, this proportion rose from 21.0% to 53.8 % [17]. In research [18], it was found that only one in every five adolescents met the recommended guidelines for physical activity (21.2%). These results were reinforced by an epidemiological study involving 1.6 million adolescents from different regions worldwide. It was described that 77.6% of boys and 84.7% of girls do not meet the guidelines for physical activity. Additionally, over the past two decades, gender disparities in adhering to physical activity guidelines have increased in every region of the world [19].

Aim of the work

The aim of the study was to present the relationship between the physiological condition of the spine, posture in the sample of children who are athletes and non-athletes.

Material and methods

In our research, we included seventh-grade students in an elementary school in Western Hungary in the 2020/2021 academic year (n=61, 31 boys, 30 girls; 12.67±0.6 years). We performed our study with the Idiag M360pro Spinal Mouse. The examiner rolls the device along the spinous processes of the C7-S1 vertebrae along the spine. The software the works with the instrument contains the necessary parameters to perform the Matthiass test [20] which can be used to measure the strength of the back muscles [21]. During the measurement, we examined the spine of the children in the sagittal plane while standing, bending forward, and after performing the Matthiass test, also while standing. The examination was carried out in the school’s medical room, where only the people performing the examination and the examined student were present. The examined person exposed his/her upper body. The person conducting the examination marked the course of the vertebrae with the help of a felt-tip pen, then guided the instrument along the spinal column of the examined person, starting from the seventh cervical vertebra. The results measured by the Spinal Mouse device were sent to the computer via Bluetooth, and the software recorded them immediately. The reference values typical for the age group are recorded in the program, and we coded the results based on them. The questionnaire used during the research was adapted from the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), to examine children’s time spent exercising and sports habits.

Statistical analysis

The sample selected based on the category variables (characteristics of the spinal sections measured in prominent body positions, gender, and physical activity) was analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square (χ2) test. In the scale variables (characteristics within, below, and above the reference value in each measured position, considering the different distinguished sections of the spine, were analyzed using the factorial ANOVA method, where p<0.05.

Results

Sample characterization

Children aged 12-13 took part in the research (n=61, M=12.67, SD=0.6), average age 12.67±0.6 years, almost half of the boys (31 people, 50.8%) and girls (30 people, 49.2%). Among the children, 23 (37.7%) play sports and 38 (62.3%) do not. We considered an athlete to be someone who, in addition to physical education at school, participates in at least 60 minutes of training at least twice a week (Table 1). Most student athletes go to training twice a week (15 people, 65.2%); seven people three times a week (30.4%), one person five times a week (4.3%). The length of the training session is one hour for six people (26.1%); 11 people (47.8%) spend an hour and a half, while six (26.1%) spend two hours occasionally training (Table 1).

Table 1

Athletes, sports and training time

SportNumber of peopleNumber of training sessions per weekLength of training session on occasion
Self-defense sports (judo, krawmaga)221 hour in 1 case,
2 hours in 1 case
Dance (hip-hop, jazz ballet)421 hour in 3 cases,
1.5 hours in 1 case
Athletics53 in 2 cases,
2 in 3 cases
1.5 hours
Football42 in 2 cases,
3 in 2 cases
1.5 hours in 2 cases,
2 hours in 2 cases
Basketball151.5 hours
Handball131.5 hours
Riding321.5 hours in 1 case,
1 hour in 2 cases
Triathlon132 hours
Water polo132 hours
Swimming122 hours

Spinal Mouse measurement results, standing position

Gender and playing sports did not show a statistically significant relationship (χ2(1, n=61)=3.062, p=0.114). However, based on the frequency data, a higher proportion of girls do not play sports (73.3%, 22 persons), while the proportion of boys is 51.6% (16 people).

Looking at the results of the standing position measurement for the entire sample, the value of dorsal kyphosis was within the reference value in 52.2% of sports children and 57.9% of non-sports children. More non-athletes showed dorsal kyphosis above reference (21.1%) compared to athletes (17.4%). Female athletes had fewer instances of back curvature above reference than males. Non-athletic girls showed a higher rate of excessive dorsal kyphosis compared to non-athletic boys (Table 2).

Table 2

Spinal Mouse results, standing position

Sac/hipReference categoriesComplete patternBoysGirls
AthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-Athlete
within the reference value1420101149
60.9%52.6%66.70%68.80%50.00%40.90%
above the reference value141301
4.3%10.5%6.70%18.80%0.00%4.50%
below the reference value81442412
34.8%36.8%26.70%12.50%50.00%54.50%
Dorsal kyphosisReference categoriesComplete patternBoysGirls
AthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-Athlete
within the reference value122259713
52.2%57.9%33.30%56.20%87.50%59.10%
above the reference value484107
17.4%21.1%26.70%6.20%0.00%31.80%
below the reference value786612
30.4%21.1%40.00%37.50%12.50%9.10%
Lumbar lordosisReference categoriesComplete patternBoysGirls
AthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-Athlete
within the reference value1418111038
60.9%47.4%73.30%62.50%37.50%36.40%
above the reference value71735412
30.4%44.7%20.00%31.20%50.00%54.50%
below the reference value231112
8.7%7.9%6.70%6.20%12.50%9.10%

Examining the lumbar lordosis, in the entire sample we examined, 60.9% of the sports children and 47.4% of the non-athletic children were within the reference value. Nonathletic girls had higher instances above the reference range. Boys, both athletes and non-athletes showed higher proportions within the reference range compared to girls (Table 2).

Among the results measured in the standing position, the sacral angle (the angle enclosed by the vertical plane and the contour line running on the surface of the sacrum) was within the reference for 60.9% of the sports children and 52.6% of the non-athletes. Boys, especially non-athletes, tended to have higher proportions within the normal range compared to girls. Non-athletic girls showed higher rates below the reference value compared to non-athletic boys (Table 2).

After the Matthiass test, in a standing position

After performing the Matthiass test, among the results measured with the spinal mouse, examining the entire sample in a standing position with regard to dorsal kyphosis, it can be said that 60.9% of the athletic students and 52.6% of the non-athletic students have results within the reference value. Few athletes (4.3%) and more non-athletes (10.5%) exceeded the reference. 66.7% of athletic boys and 68.8% of non-athletic boys had normal values, but girls showed lower percentages (athletes: 50.0%, non-athletes: 40.9%). Few boys were above the reference (6.7%) and one non-athletic girl (Table 3).

Table 3

After the Matthiass test, in standing position

Sac/hipReference categoriesComplete patternBoysGirls
AthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-Athlete
within the reference value13251014311
56.5%65.8%66.70%87.50%37.50%50.00%
above the reference value414100
17.4%2.6%26.70%6.20%0 %0 %
below the reference value61211511
26.1%31.6%6.70%6.20%62.50%50.00%
Dorsal kyphosisReference categoriesComplete patternBoysGirls
AthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-Athlete
within the reference value1420101149
60.9%52.6%66.70%68.80%50.00%40.90%
above the reference value141301
4.3%10.5%6.70%18.80%0.00%4.50%
below the reference value81442412
34.8%36.8%26.70%12.50%50.00%54.50%
Lumbar lordosisReference categoriesComplete patternBoysGirls
AthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-Athlete
within the reference value16211111510
69.6%55.3%73.30%68.80%62.50%45.50%
above the reference value2101218
8.7%26.3%6.70%12.50%12.50%36.40%
below the reference value573324
21.7%18.4%20.00%18.80%25.00%18.20%

When examining the lumbar lordosis of our entire sample during the measurement performed after the Matthiass test, it can be said that 69.6% of the athletic students and 53.3% of the non-athletic students had results within the reference range, with fewer athletes above (8.7%) versus more non-athletes (26.3%). Male athletes (73.3%) and non-athletic boys (68.8%) had higher within-reference percentages than their female counterparts (Table 3).

Examining the values of the sacral angle after the Matthiass test, in the case of the entire sample, it can be said that 56.5% of the athletes and 65.8% of the non-athletes have values within the reference range. More athletes (17.4%) than non-athletes (2.6%) exceeded the reference. Large gender differences existed, notably with 87.5% of non-athletic boys within reference compared to 37.5% of athletic girls. Only boys manifested values above the reference (Table 3).

Careless posture, poor posture

Negligence and playing sports show a statistically significant relationship (χ2(1, n=61)=6.036, p=0.018). In the sample we examined, the prevalence of careless posture was typical for 71.1% (27 people) of non-sporting adolescents and 39.1% (9 people) of sports children. A similar ratio is more common among girls. This is also true for boys, but the proportion is higher for the non-athletic group, almost 40%, who do not have sloppy posture (Table 4).

Table 4

Careless posture, poor posture

Careless postureAnswerComplete patternBoysGirls
AthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-Athlete
yes927610317
39.1%71.1%40.00%62.50%37.50%77.30%
no14119655
60.9%28.9%60.00%37.50%62.50%22.70%
Poor postureAnswerComplete patternBoysGirls
AthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-AthleteAthleteNon-Athlete
yes624210414
26.1%63.2%13.30%62.50%50.00%63.60%
no171413648
73.9%36.8%86.70%37.50%50.00%36.40%

Postural weakness and playing sports show a statistically significant relationship (χ2(1, n=61)=7.878, p=0.008). A smaller proportion of athletic adolescents have poor posture (26.1%, 6 people) compared to non- athletes (63.2%, 24 people). In this case, only 13.3% of athletic boys are affected, while 62.5% of non-athletic boys are affected. Among girls, 50.0% of athletes and 63.6% of non-athletes have postural weakness. In girls, postural weakness and playing sports do not show a significant relationship (Table 4).

Discussion

In standing position, after measurement

Increased dorsal kyphosis occurs in a slightly lower proportion among athletes, and flatter dorsal curvature occurs in a slightly higher proportion than in non-athletes. In the case of female athletes, we can say that most of them (87.5%) have a normal level of dorsal kyphosis, while in the case of male athletes, this ratio is very low (33.3%) (Table 2). In the case of boys, there is no significant difference between the athlete and non-athlete groups, values below and above the reference value occur in the same proportion as values within the reference [22]. So, we cannot say that the results presented by the athletes are clearly better, only in the case of girls.

In terms of lumbar lordosis, a higher proportion of athletes have values within the reference, but the proportion of results above the reference value is relatively high (athletes: 30.4%, non-athletes: 44.7%) for both groups. This indicates that the lumbar curve is flattened in many cases and does not correspond to physiological values. These relatively “straight” lumbar spine sections affect the structures above and below them, influencing their size. Relatively few students have blood vessels below the reference range, which corresponds to the current state of research, according to which the lumbar curve straightens and flattens due to a sedentary lifestyle and prolonged sitting [23]. Regarding lumbar lordosis, the results presented by the boys and girls are not the same. Physiological lumbar curvature of a normal degree occurs most often among boys (Table 2), looking at both the athlete and non-athlete groups, while the flattened lumbar curvature with a smaller than normal curve appears most often in girls for both groups. Increased lumbar lordosis affects few children. It was found that athletic adolescents had a higher proportion of lumbar lordosis and sacral angle in the normal range, and their spine had greater mobility in the sagittal and frontal planes, compared to their non-athletic peers [24]. Regarding our own sample, among boys, the athletes produced significantly better results than their non-athlete peers. Opposite results were presented by the girls, where the value of the sacral angle of half of the female athletes is outside the reference range during the first measurement, and after performing the Matthiass test, only 37.5% of them can be said to have a value within the reference range. The result was similar regarding the lumbar lordosis – very few (37.5%) of the female athletes have a normal lumbar curvature.

Regarding the sacral angle, there is a significant difference between the boys and girls, as well as sportsmen and non-sportsmen. While nearly two-thirds of the boys fall within the normal range, less than half of the girls and the other half of the girls fall into the category below the reference value (athletes and non-athletes alike). This can be related to the position of the pelvis, which affects the entire spinal column and with it the posture [25]. Values below the reference range indicate a forward-tilted pelvis. In this case, it is very necessary to change the posture of the pelvis to a normal range, because the lower part of the abdominal muscles stretches and the upper part shrinks, the deep back muscles become inactive as a result of the forward-tilted pelvis, and this part of the spine also loses its flexibility [26]. De Assis et al. [6] found that non-athletic students were at greater risk of scoliosis than athletes. Examining the relationship between sports and the quality of posture, Radaković et al. [5] found that most changes occur in the sagittal plane of the spine during adolescence. Based on their results, it can be said that posture disorders occurred in a similar proportion between athletes and non-athletes. In the sample we examined, a large percentage of male athletes (66.7%) in terms of dorsal kyphosis and female athletes (62.5%) in terms of lumbar lordosis fell outside the reference range, so when examining the physiological state of the spine, it cannot be said that the athletes fared better than their non-athlete counterparts. Therefore, it is recommended for everyone to incorporate posture-improving and mobilizing exercises into the daily routine. Playing sports has many benefits, but excessive strain can also have harmful effects on the spine, especially during adolescence [13,27]. Accordingly, all exercise professionals must monitor proper posture and movement patterns to help develop and maintain a healthy spine.

After the Matthiass test, in standing position

Based on the results of the Matthiass test, dorsal kyphosis is in the normal range for two-thirds of athletic and non-athletic boys. This is a higher proportion than in the case of girls, where the same characteristics can be said for half of the athletes and 40.9% of the non-athletes. It is gratifying that only four of the examined sample (n=61) were in the range above the reference value, indicating weakness of posture. It is an interesting observation that half of the athletic girls and more than half of the non-athletic girls fall into the category below the reference value, less than a third of the athletic boys, and only two of the non-athletic boys. In their case, we can speak of a straighter dorsal spine section, where the degree of kyphotic curvature is smaller than the physiological one. This is not good, because it creates muscle asymmetry, which, if left untreated, can lead to changes in bony structures later.

During the first standing measurement, the percentage of lumbar lordosis results below the reference value was 8.7% among student athletes and 7.9% among non-athletes. After performing the Matthiass test, this rate increased from 8.7% to 21.7%, and from 7.9% to 18.4%. This suggests that postural weakness does not occur everywhere on the back. These adolescents were trying to compensate for the postural and spatial imbalances caused by the weakening of the muscles in the lumbar spine. This can be said for both boys and girls, as well as athletes and non-athletes. In terms of results within the reference range, there was a higher proportion of athletes among both the boys and girls (boys: 73.3%, girls: 62.5%) with a normal lumbar lordosis compared to non-athletes (boys: 68.8%, girls: 45.5%). 36.4% of non-sporting girls have a milder lumbar curve. They would be advised to regularly perform mobilizing exercises to improve the segmental mobility of the spine in this section.

Regarding the sacral angle, a greater proportion of boys have values within the reference range, while a greater proportion of girls have values below the reference range. The results of the first measurement were similar to the results measured after the Matthiass test. In both groups, a much higher proportion of girls had values below the reference level. For the first measurement: 50.00% and 54.50%, for the second measurement: 62.50% and 50.00%. In the case of the second measurement, the decrease in the value of the sacral angle appears at an even higher rate in the group of female athletes, which indicates a forward tilt of the pelvis after the test. This value can also be associated with an increase in lumbar lordosis. The combined change of these two values indicates the local appearance of postural weakness in the lumbar region of the spine. Low sacral angle values indicate that the pelvis tilts forward, which affects the entire spine and posture. Therefore, it is particularly important that the pelvic position and lumbar lordosis values are in the normal range, as this improves posture and spinal problems. To prevent such problems, regular exercise and proper posture improvement programs are recommended.

Careless posture, poor posture

Athletic boys struggle with poor posture and poor posture to a lesser extent than their non-athletic peers. Athlete girls also have a smaller proportion of sloppy posture, but this is not true with regard to poor posture – 50% of both athletic and non-athletic girls struggle with poor posture. It is therefore particularly important to pay attention to posture among girls, where there is no demonstrable connection between postural weakness and playing sports.

Conclusions

This study examined spinal posture in adolescent athletes and non-athletes. Some differences were observed between the two groups. Female athletes displayed better dorsal kyphosis, while male athletes exhibited superior lumbar lordosis. However, deviations from healthy spinal curvature were prevalent among both genders in certain areas. Contrary to expectations, overall spinal health was not markedly better among athletes. Both athlete and non-athlete groups showed variations in spinal posture, influenced by factors like rapid growth, lifestyle, and sports specialization. Therefore, incorporating posture-improving exercises into daily routines for all adolescents is crucial. Further research is needed to explore the specific causes behind spinal irregularities in adolescents, considering lifestyle habits and sport-related strains. Continuous guidance and tailored interventions are essential for promoting holistic spinal health in this demographic. While sports offer several advantages, excessive strain from certain activities might pose risks to spinal health, especially during the critical phase of adolescence. Professionals should closely monitor posture and movement patterns, ensuring healthy spinal development during adolescence.

Research limitations

The results can be distorted by the fact that we do not know who started from which category during the measurement with the spinal mouse. Because if the person started with a value below the reference in the case of dorsal kyphosis, and after the Matthiass test it was in the normal range, there was also a ROM change in the segmental movement of the spinal column, which could indicate postural weakness.

Disclosures and acknowledgements

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The examinations were conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Research ethics permit number for the study: 2020/136, issued by the Research Ethics Committee of ELTE (Hungary).

Artificial intelligence (AI) was not used in the creation of the manuscript.

Notes

[1] Szigethy M, Nagyváradi K, Heszteráné Ekler J, Ihász F. Relationship between spinal column health and physical activity among schoolchildren aged 12-13. Health Prob Civil. 2024; 18(3): 310-319. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpc.2024.134276

References

1 

Latalski M, Bylina J, Fatyga M, Repko M, Filipovic M, Jarosz JM, et al. Risk factors of postural defects in children at school age. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 2013; 20(3): 583-587.

2 

Iunes DH, Cecílio MB, Dozza MA, Almeida PR. Quantitative analysis of the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the klapp method using computerized biophotogrammetry. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2010; 14: 133-140. 10.1590/S1413-35552010005000009

3 

Somhegyi A, Lazáry Á, Feszthammer A, Darabosné TI, Tóthné SV, Boja S, et al. The incorporation of movement materials aimed at establishing, automating, and maintaining biomechanically correct posture in physical education. Public Health. 2014; 92(1): 11-19.

4 

Skoffer B, Foldspang A. Physical activity and low-back pain in schoolchildren. European Spine Journal. 2008; 17: 373-379. 10.1007/s00586-007-0583-8

5 

Radaković M, Protić-Gava B, Radaković K, Madić DM. Differences in postural status of primary school students who engage in different sports and their peers who do not engage in sports. Facta Universitatis, Series: Physical Education and Sport. 2017; 15(1): 063-071.

6 

de Assis SJC, Sanchis GJB, de Souza CG, Roncalli AG. Influence of physical activity and postural habits in schoolchildren with scoliosis. Archives of Public Health. 2021; 79(1): 1-7. 10.1186/s13690-021-00584-6

7 

Ęokić Z, Stojanović M. Morphologic characteristics and postural status in children aged 9 to 12 years in Sremska Mitrovica municipality. General Medicine. 2010; 16(1-2): 41-49.

8 

Edington DW, Schultz AB, Pitts JS, Camilleri A. The future of health promotion in the 21st century: a focus on the working population. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2016; 10(4): 242-252. 10.1177/1559827615605789

9 

Dima C, Mitoiu B, Nartea R, Dima C. Hyperkyphotic posture among adolescents–still a public health problem. Romanian JouRnal of PediatRics. 2022; 71(2): 51-60. 10.37897/RJP.2022.2.6

10 

O’Donovan G, Blazevich AJ, Boreham C, Cooper AR, Crank H, Ekelund U, et al. The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2010; 28(6): 573-591. 10.1080/02640411003671212

11 

Bergmann GG, Bergmann MLA, Marques AC, Hallal PC. Prevalence of physical inactivity and associated factors among adolescents from public schools in Uruguaiana, Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2013; 29(11): 2217-2229. 10.1590/0102-311x00077512

12 

McMaster ME, Lee AJ, Burwell RG. Physical activities of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): preliminary longitudinal case–control study historical evaluation of possible risk factors. Scoliosis. 2015; 10(1): 1-10. 10.1186/s13013-015-0029-8

13 

Kikuchi R, Hirano T, Watanabe K, Sano A, Sato T, Ito T, et al. Gender differences in the prevalence of low back pain associated with sports activities in children and adolescents: a six-year annual survey of a birth cohort in Niigata City, Japan. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019; 20(1): 1-6. 10.1186/s12891-019-2707-9

14 

Pavlik G. The role of regular physical activity in disease prevention and health preservation. Health Science. 2015; 59 (2): 11-26.

15 

Bezalel T, Carmeli E, Levi D, Kalichman L. The effect of Schroth therapy on thoracic kyphotic curve and quality of life in Scheuermann’s patients: a randomized controlled trial. Asian spine journal. 2019; 13(3): 490-99. 10.31616/asj.2018.0097

16 

World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

17 

Kovács VA, Gábor A, Fajcsák Z, Martos E. Sport habits and sedentary lifestyle among elementary school children in Obuda, Hungary. Medical Weekly. 2010; 151(16): 652-658. 10.1556/oh.2010.28765

18 

Guedes DP, Zuppa MA. Adherence to combined healthy movement behavior guidelines among adolescents: effects on cardiometabolic health markers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(14): 8798. 10.3390/ijerph19148798

19 

Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health. 2020; 4: 23-35. 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2

20 

Kempf HD, Fischer J. [Back training for children]. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt; 1993 (in German).

21 

Mannion AF, Knecht K, Balaban G, Dvorak J, Grob D. A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. European Spine Journal. 2004; 13(2): 122-136. 10.1007/s00586-003-0618-8

22 

Chertman C, dos Santos HMC, Pires L, Wajchenberg M, Martins DE, Puertas EB. A comparative study of lumbar range of movement in healthy athletes and non-athletes. Revista Brasileria de Ortopedia. 2010; 45(4): 389-394. 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30385-2

23 

Grabara M, Bieniec A, Nawrocka A. Spinal curvatures of children and adolescents–a cross-sectional study. Biomedical Human Kinetics. 2017; 9(1): 69-74. 10.1515/bhk-2017-0011

24 

Mucha D, Ambroży T, Ząbek M, Wojtala J, Szczygieł A, Żaba K, et al. Physical activity as a condition for correct body posture for youth. Science–Practice–Reflections. 2015; 19: 139-148.

25 

Yang L, Lu X, Yan B, Huang Y. Prevalence of incorrect posture among children and adolescents: finding from a large population-based study in China. iScience. 2020; 23(5): 1-10. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101043

26 

Somhegyi A, Gardi ZZ, Feszthammer A, Darabosné TI, Tóthné, SV. Posture correction – exercises that promote the control and development of muscle strength and muscle extensibility necessary for the development of biomechanically correct posture. Budapest, Hungary: Hungarian Society of Spine Medicine; 2003.

27 

Van Gent C, Dols JJCM, De Rover CM, Sing REH, De Vet HCW. The weight of schoolbags and the occurrence of neck, shoulder, and back pain in young adolescents. Spine. 2003; 28(9): 916-921. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000058721.69053.EC

Copyright: © 2024 Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biała Podlaska. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.